Sloan-C Logo
  
   
  - Publications - Journal: JALN - Vol9:1   
Top shadow
Journal: JALN
Survey Reports
Sloan-C View
Workshop Pubs
Books
ALN Magazine
Free Downloads

 
 register/help
User Name:

Password:

JALNlogo Volume 9, Issue 1 - March 2005
ISSN 1092-8235


TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
Gender, Voice and Learning in Online Course Environments  
 
David M. Anderson
Carol J. Haddad
Eastern Michigan University

Abstract:
A self-selected sample of 109 online students at a midwestern regional university was surveyed and asked to compare expression of voice, control over learning, and perceived deep learning outcomes in face-to-face versus online course environments. We found that females experience greater perceived deep learning in online than in face-to-face courses, and that expression of voice appears to contribute to this outcome. This effect did not occur for male students. We also found that professor support and, to a lesser extent, control over one's learning each had positive relationships with perceived deep learning in both course environments. Concern for the feelings of other students did not have a negative impact on voice as was originally hypothesized.

 
   
Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime    
 

John Bourne
Sloan Consortium, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Babson College
Dale Harris
Sloan Consortium, Purdue University
Frank Mayadas
Sloan Consortium, The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Abstract:
The emergence of worldwide communications networks and powerful computer technologies has redefined the concept of distance learning and the delivery of engineering education content. This article discusses the Sloan Consortium’s quest for quality, scale, and breadth in online learning, the impact on both continuing education of graduate engineers as well as degree-seeking engineering students, and the future of engineering colleges and schools as worldwide providers of engineering education.
*This article was originally published in the Journal of Engineering Education , Vol. 94, No. 1, January 2005, pp. 131–146.

 
   
Digital Text, Distance Education and Academic Dishonesty: Faculty and Administrator Perceptions and Responses    
 

Kimberly B. Kelley, Ph.D.
Kimberly Bonner, J.D.

The Center for Intellectual Property
University of Maryland University College

Abstract:
This study examined administrator and faculty perceptions of the frequency and pervasiveness of student academic dishonesty, including their perceptions of the personal and contextual factors that affect whether a student is likely to engage in any form of academic dishonesty. One important contextual factor examined in this study was the extent to which the respondents thought that using the Internet in a course, delivering a course via distance education, or the availability of digital text through the Internet impacted the prevalence, prevention, and detection of academic dishonesty.

 
   
The Ebb and Flow of Online Discussions: What Bloom Can Tell Us About Our Students’ Conversations    
 

Katrina A. Meyer
The University of Memphis

Abstract:
This study looks at online discussions within the context of a group endeavor and attempts to evaluate three assertions: 1) students in an online discussion proceed through higher levels of thinking; 2) Online conversations follow an “ebb and flow” pattern; 3) The level of the first posting to the discussion influences the level of subsequent postings. Postings were classified by the Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives and were graphed to help analyze the assertions. There was only modest support for the first assertion and better support for the second and third assertions. Analyzing online discussions as a group endeavor may well prove an interesting area of research for those interested in applying the existing body of literature and theory on group discussions in the face-to-face arena to the online environment. Researchers need to evaluate whether this literature is applicable to online discussions and what distinctions can legitimately be made between group discussions in the face-to-face or online mode.

 
   
Roles of Faculty in Teaching Asynchronous Undergraduate Courses    
 

Libby V. Morris, PhD
University of Georgia
Haixia Xu
University of Georgia
Catherine L. Finnegan, EdD
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

Abstract:
Although the availability of web-based education and the number of totally asynchronous courses have grown exponentially in the last decade, the literature on online instruction offers limited empirical guidance to faculty teaching in this environment. Much of the literature is anecdotal and prescriptive, and much more research needs to be done to situate research in practice settings. This study examines faculty roles in the online environment through the perceptions of faculty teaching online and through the archival analysis of their courses. Data were collected through document analysis of ten online courses and from interviews with thirteen instructors in the humanities and social sciences. Using Berge’s typology of online facilitator roles, this study examined the relationship between roles as perceived and enacted by faculty, identified wide variations in faculty roles and participation between experienced and novice instructors, and explored the relationship between faculty workload and perception of facilitation in the online environment. Directions for future research are suggested.

 
   
Questioning the Hybrid Model: Student Outcomes in Different Course Formats    
 

Saxon G. Reasons, EdD
Kevin Valadares, PhD
Michael Slavkin, PhD

University of Southern Indiana

Abstract:
Current literature suggests that a hybrid model of distance education supports student learning more effectively than any other format. It also seems likely that the hybrid format can be used in most courses. The purpose of our study was to examine the strength of these assertions. This study examined the outcomes of two introductory courses in teacher education and health services employing similar pedagogical methods within three delivery formats (face-to-face, internet-based, and hybrid) in an effort to compare each of these modes of instruction. Results demonstrate that significant differences exist among the various formats and that the internet-based format could possibly lead to better student outcomes compared to face-to-face and hybrid formats.

 
   
A Learning Object Success Story    
 

Robin Mason
Chris Pegler
Martin Weller

The Open University, UK

Abstract:
This paper outlines an approach to designing a course entirely in learning objects. It provides a theoretical basis for the design and then presents evaluation data from a master’s level course using this design. It also describes several re-uses of the learning objects on other courses and in different contexts. Each learning object is conceived as a whole learning experience, thus avoiding many of the problems associated with assembling components of disparate kinds.

 
   
   

 

The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks (JALN) is published by the Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C™). Responsibility for the contents rests with the authors and not with Sloan-C™. Copyright © 2005 by Sloan-C™. All rights reserved.